Twitter's Latest Move: DM Limitations for Unverified Users Looms
In a whirlwind of controversy and dismay, Twitter is once again under scrutiny for its decision-making under the reign of Elon Musk. The social media behemoth has unleashed yet another volley of changes, raising concerns about a growing monopolistic grasp on users' freedom, which seems to be slipping through our tweeting fingers with every passing moment.
The most recent of these changes, revealed in a July 21 tweet from Twitter Support, announces the introduction of daily direct message (DM) limits for unverified users. Twitter is allegedly implementing this change to combat spam in Direct Messages. Yet, this leaves us with an unanswered question: Are we witnessing an attempt to foster a healthier Twitter environment or a crafty strategy to herd unverified users into paid verification?
Reactions to this new policy reveal a predominantly negative sentiment, with both verified and unverified users highlighting their concerns. A tweet from AustimCapital, a popular citizen journalist account, insightfully noted, "In our opinion, this is a sales funnel to get more users verified and into [Twitter] Blue, not to combat spam." The skepticism is understandable, given Twitter's recent shift toward paid features and services.
These changes have followed a series of disruptive actions under Musk's helm. Earlier this month, Twitter imposed a limit on the number of posts users could see daily. And in April, the platform rolled out content monetization settings, enabling creators to monetize posts globally.
Yet, it was Musk's announcement of a paid verification plan that turned the most heads. For $8 a month (or $11 for iOS users, thanks to Apple's 30% in-app purchase tax), users can get a blue checkmark – a feature typically reserved for celebrities and prominent figures. The plan was a contentious move, seen by many as a naked grab for revenue, offering little value for the average user while catering to the vanity of a few.
Another intriguing move was Musk's initiative to reinstate previously banned accounts, sparking heated debates about accountability and the reintegration of rule violators. This surprising action, however, did not result in any alterations to Twitter's rules and regulations.
But even in the midst of all these seismic shifts, Musk's ban on doxxing stands out. After his son had a close encounter with a stalker, Musk moved swiftly to change Twitter's rules, banning the sharing of live location information. The move, intended to protect personal safety, raised concerns about its potential misuse, especially in situations of civil unrest and protest.
Musk’s changes didn't stop there. In a brief and ill-fated attempt, Twitter banned links to selected competing social platforms. The policy was promptly reversed due to backlash, yet it served as a stark reminder of Musk's unsettling determination to safeguard Twitter's turf at any cost.
Despite the uproar and the sweeping declarations, the reality is that Twitter hasn't drastically changed its functionality or core values under Musk's ownership. The platform continues to explore new features, like ad-free subscription tiers and longer tweets, but the fundamental essence of Twitter remains intact.
What has changed, though, is the narrative. Elon Musk has expertly played the media, inciting controversy, and grabbing headlines with every tweet. His knack for sparking conversation is his greatest strength, pulling users to Twitter to keep up with the latest developments.
But, one must wonder how long this strategy can last. Elon's ceaseless thirst for attention, his political provocation, and his brazen disregard for platform regulations could eventually reach a tipping point. The question is, will Elon have to retreat from the driver's seat when the ride gets too bumpy? His past indicates a certain stubbornness, but only time will tell whether Twitter's path leads to prosperity or peril under Musk's watch.
In the grand scheme of things, we can only hope that Twitter remains an open platform, cherishing user freedom, encouraging healthy conversation, and not morphing into a puppet theater directed by one man's whims. For Twitter, as for any democratic space, the balance between governance and freedom is delicate and should be handled with care. After all, the beauty of Twitter lies in its chaotic harmony – a digital agora where every voice counts. Let's ensure it remains that way.
Also, read - FedNow: Fed's Another Attack to the Crypto Community
from Coin Gabbar News https://ift.tt/OrgLCdi
via IFTTT
